Skip to content
Android waitlistTry on iPad
Get started

Presenting data, conclusions and uncertainties: Edexcel International A Level Chemistry questions

Edexcel International A Level Chemistry past-paper questions on P.1.2 Presenting data, conclusions and uncertainties, 2019–2025, with mark schemes and examiner’s reports where available.

Paper
All papers
Exam
All years
Calculations

4,117 questions

Full page
  1. Q4(e)(ii)

    June 2025 · AS Unit 3

    The whole paper ↗
    The start of question 4

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  2. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  3. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  4. Q2(f)(i)

    January 2025 · AS Unit 3

    The whole paper ↗
    The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  5. Q4(b)(iii)

    October 2024 · AS Unit 3

    The whole paper ↗
    The start of question 4

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  6. Q4(c)(i)

    October 2024 · AS Unit 3

    The whole paper ↗
    The start of question 4

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  7. Q18(c)(iii)

    October 2024 · Unit 5

    The whole paper ↗
    The start of question 18

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  8. The start of question 4

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  9. Q4(d)

    June 2024 (R) · AS Unit 3

    The whole paper ↗
    The start of question 4

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  10. The start of question 4

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  11. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  12. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  13. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  14. Q3(c)

    October 2022 · AS Unit 3

    The whole paper ↗
    The start of question 3

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  15. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  16. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  17. The start of question 2

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  18. Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
    Your answer
  19. The start of question 1

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
  20. The start of question 3

    Loading the start of the question…

    Loading the question…

    Open the full PDF
All 25 questions on Presenting data, conclusions and uncertainties, as a list
  1. June 2025, AS Unit 3, Q4(e)(ii) (2 marks): Explain why, during an experiment using 2.00 g of accurately weighed out iron wool, the mass of product measured in the weighing bottle was greater than your an
  2. June 2025, Unit 6, Q2(c)(iii) (1 mark): The solubility of calcium hydroxide decreases with increasing temperature. Suggest why the mean titre from the experiment in (c)(i) does not agree with the expe
  3. January 2025, AS Unit 3, Q2(e) (2 marks): The magnesium ribbon used in Step 1 contained a magnesium oxide impurity of up to 2% by mass. Explain whether this magnesium oxide impurity could account for an
  4. January 2025, AS Unit 3, Q2(f)(i) (1 mark): Calculate the percentage uncertainty in the mass of magnesium used in the experiment. (1)
  5. October 2024, AS Unit 3, Q4(b)(iii) (1 mark): Suggest why the value calculated from the graph may not be accurate. (1)
  6. October 2024, AS Unit 3, Q4(c)(i) (1 mark): In most kinetics experiments the rate of reaction decreases with time. Suggest a reason why the rate of reaction seems to increase in this experiment. (1)
  7. October 2024, Unit 5, Q18(c)(iii) (1 mark): Give one possible reason why any concentrations of copper(II) sulfate determined from the graph of values over 0.50 mol dm−3 are uncertain. (1)
  8. June 2024, AS Unit 3, Q4(d)(iii) (1 mark): Give a possible reason why the temperature does not appear to change at various times, such as 5½ to 6½ minutes. (1)
  9. June 2024 (R), AS Unit 3, Q4(d) (1 mark): State why it is not necessary to repeat these experiments for each halogenoalkane. (1)
  10. June 2023, AS Unit 3, Q4(b)(i) (1 mark): Calculate the percentage error in this student’s value. The data book value for the molar volume of hydrogen under these conditions is 23.9 dm3 mol–1. (1)
  11. January 2023, AS Unit 3, Q2(b)(iv) (1 mark): The uncertainty in each reading of the thermometer was ±0.1°C. Calculate the percentage uncertainty in the temperature change in the student’s experiment. (1)
  12. January 2023, AS Unit 3, Q2(c)(i) (1 mark): State how the changes in the experiment improve the percentage uncertainties in the measurement of mass and temperature. No calculation is required. (1)
  13. January 2023, AS Unit 3, Q2(c)(ii) (2 marks): Explain how the difference between uncertainty and accuracy led the teacher to make this statement. (2)
  14. October 2022, AS Unit 3, Q3(c) (1 mark): Suggest why some of the precipitate heights may be above the maximum height expected. Assume there were no measurement errors. (1)
  15. October 2022, Unit 6, Q2(d)(i) (3 marks): Explain the effect, if any, on the titre value and hence on the calculated percentage of ammonium sulfate in the fertiliser. (3)
  16. June 2022, AS Unit 3, Q2(b)(i) (1 mark): Calculate the experimental error for the second student. [Ar of potassium = 39.1] (1)
  17. June 2022, AS Unit 3, Q2(b)(ii) (3 marks): The second student calculated the Ar value of M to be 37.52 with a total percentage uncertainty of 4.5 %. Comment on the value of 37.52 obtained by this student
  18. June 2022, Unit 5, Q6 (1 mark): A titre has an uncertainty of 0.32 %. The uncertainty of each burette reading is ±0.05 cm3 . What is the most likely value of the titre in cm3 ? A 6.40 B 15.60
  19. January 2022, AS Unit 3, Q1(c)(ii) (2 marks): The total percentage uncertainty in this experiment was 2.6 %. Show that the enthalpy change of 14.5 kJ mol–1 is consistent with a data book value of 14.8 kJ mo
  20. January 2022, AS Unit 3, Q3(c)(i) (2 marks): Complete the table and use the concordant results to calculate the mean titre. (2)
  21. October 2021, AS Unit 3, Q4(b) (2 marks): Evaluate the students' results and decide whether it is necessary to repeat their experiments. (2)
  22. October 2021, Unit 6, Q3(c) (1 mark): The thermometer used to measure the temperature change had an uncertainty of ±0.25 °C for each measurement. Calculate the percentage uncertainty in the temperat
  23. January 2021, AS Unit 3, Q3(b)(ii) (2 marks): The student suggested that the experiment could be made more accurate by increasing the mass of carbonate from 0.33 g to 1.00 g. No changes to the size of the a
  24. October 2020, Unit 6, Q3(e)(ii) (2 marks): Give two reasons why Run 1 has the lowest uncertainty in the volume measurements. (2)
  25. June 2019, AS Unit 3, Q3(b)(iv) (1 mark): One mass of M in the experiment gave an anomalous data point. Suggest a reason, other than measurement error, for this anomaly. (1)

Questions, mark schemes and examiner’s reports are © Pearson Edexcel, from their published past papers. Plumi isn’t affiliated with any exam board. Want whole papers? Edexcel International A Level Chemistry past papers.

The Plumi iPad app also offers exam-style questions with AI feedback on your handwritten working.