Skip to content
Android waitlistTry on iPad

Leadership of the crusades, 1095–1192: Edexcel A‑Level History questions

Every Edexcel A-Level History exam question on Leadership of the crusades, 1095–1192, 2017–2025, with its mark scheme and examiner’s report.

Paper
All papers
Exam
All years
Calculations

1,491 questions

  1. 0 words
  2. Q4

    June 2024 · Paper 1A

    The whole paper ↗
    0 words
  3. Q1

    June 2023 · Paper 1A

    The whole paper ↗
    0 words
  4. 0 words
  5. 0 words
  6. 0 words
  7. 0 words
All 7 questions on Leadership of the crusades, 1095–1192, as a list
  1. June 2025, Paper 1A, Q4 (20 marks): How far do you agree that the failure of the Second Crusade was the main turning point in the fortunes of the crusader states in the years 1100–92?
  2. June 2024, Paper 1A, Q4 (20 marks): How far do you agree that Richard I provided the most significant example of effective crusader leadership in the years 1095–1192?
  3. June 2023, Paper 1A, Q1 (20 marks): How accurate is it to say that the leadership of the Second Crusade was very different from the leadership of the First Crusade?
  4. November 2021, Paper 1A, Q4 (20 marks): How far do you agree that the motives of crusade leaders changed little in the years 1095–1192?
  5. June 2019, Paper 1A, Q2 (20 marks): How far do you agree that the leadership of Saladin was substantially different from that of his European opponents in the years 1169-92?
  6. June 2019, Paper 1A, Q4 (20 marks): How far do you agree that the Second Crusade was a turning point in the government of Outremer in the years 1118-92?
  7. June 2018, Paper 1A, Q2 (20 marks): How far do you agree that the main consequence of the failure of the Second Crusade was limited European support for the crusader states in the years 1149–92?

Questions, mark schemes and examiner’s reports are © Pearson Edexcel, from their published past papers. Plumi isn’t affiliated with any exam board. Want whole papers? Full past papers.

Rather write your answers by hand on iPad? Plumi marks them against the same mark schemes.