plumiBentham and Kant: AQA A‑Level Religious Studies questions
Every AQA A-Level Religious Studies exam question on 1B.7 Bentham and Kant, 2020–2025, with its mark scheme and examiner’s report.
Paper
All papers
Exam
All years
Q06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ05.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ05.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ05.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ05.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ05.1
The whole paper ↗0 wordsQ06.1
The whole paper ↗0 words
All 21 questions on Bentham and Kant, as a list
- June 2024, Paper 2A, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s ethics are compatible with Buddhist ethical teaching.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Buddhism and eth
- June 2024, Paper 2B, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s ethics are compatible with Christian ethical teaching.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Christianity an
- June 2024, Paper 2C, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s ethics are compatible with Hindu ethical teaching.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Hinduism and Kant.
- June 2024, Paper 2D, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s ethics are compatible with Muslim ethical teaching.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Islam and Kant.
- June 2024, Paper 2E, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s ethics are compatible with Jewish ethical teaching.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Judaism and ethica
- June 2023, Paper 2A, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s consequential ethics have no value for Buddhists.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Buddhism and Bent
- June 2023, Paper 2B, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s consequential ethics have no value for Christians.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Christianity and
- June 2023, Paper 2C, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s consequential ethics have no value for Hindus.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Hinduism and Bentham
- June 2023, Paper 2D, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s consequential ethics have no value for Muslims.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Islam and Bentham.
- June 2023, Paper 2E, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s consequential ethics have no value for Jews.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Judaism and Bentham.
- June 2022, Paper 2A, Q05.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s way of making moral decisions is compatible with Buddhist ethics.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between B
- June 2022, Paper 2A, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s way of moral decision making supports Buddhist beliefs about lying.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Bu
- June 2022, Paper 2B, Q05.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s way of making moral decisions is compatible with Christian ethics.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between
- June 2022, Paper 2B, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s way of moral decision making supports Christian beliefs about lying.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between C
- June 2022, Paper 2C, Q05.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s way of making moral decisions is compatible with Hindu ethics.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Hind
- June 2022, Paper 2C, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s way of moral decision making supports Hindu beliefs about lying.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Hindu
- June 2022, Paper 2D, Q05.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s way of making moral decisions is compatible with Muslim ethics.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Isl
- June 2022, Paper 2D, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s way of moral decision making supports Muslim beliefs about lying.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Isla
- June 2022, Paper 2E, Q05.1 (25 marks): ‘Bentham’s way of making moral decisions is compatible with Jewish ethics.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Jud
- June 2022, Paper 2E, Q06.1 (25 marks): ‘Kant’s way of moral decision making supports Jewish beliefs about lying.’ Critically examine and evaluate this view with reference to the dialogue between Juda
- November 2020, Paper 1, Q04.2 (15 marks): ‘The ethical theories of Bentham and Kant are not consistent with religious moral decision making.’ Evaluate this claim.
Questions, mark schemes and examiner’s reports are © AQA, from their published past papers. Plumi isn’t affiliated with any exam board. Want whole papers? Full past papers.
Rather write your answers by hand on iPad? Plumi marks them against the same mark schemes.