Skip to content

Ontological arguments: AQA A‑Level Philosophy questions

Every AQA A-Level Philosophy exam question on 3.3.2.1 Ontological arguments, 2020–2025, with its mark scheme and examiner’s report.

Find questions120

120 questions

  1. Q03

    June 2024 · Paper 2

    The whole paper ↗
    June 2024 Paper 2, question 03: Explain how an empiricist might object to the ontological argument as an a priori proof for God’s existence. [5 marks]
  2. Q02

    June 2023 · Paper 2

    The whole paper ↗
    June 2023 Paper 2, question 02: Outline Norman Malcolm’s ontological argument. [5 marks]
  3. Q01

    June 2022 · Paper 2

    The whole paper ↗
    June 2022 Paper 2, question 01: State the definitions of ‘God’ used by (a) Anselm and (b) Descartes in their ontological arguments. [3 marks]
  4. Q05

    November 2021 · Paper 2

    The whole paper ↗
    November 2021 Paper 2, question 05: Can God’s existence be proved using an ontological argument? [25 marks]
  5. Q03

    November 2020 · Paper 2

    The whole paper ↗
    November 2020 Paper 2, question 03: Explain how inductive and deductive arguments for the existence of God differ. [5 marks]
  6. Q04

    November 2020 · Paper 2

    The whole paper ↗
    November 2020 Paper 2, question 04: Outline St Anselm’s ontological argument and explain Gaunilo’s ‘perfect island’ objection. [12 marks]
All 6 questions on Ontological arguments, as a list
  1. June 2024, Paper 2, Q03 (5 marks): Explain how an empiricist might object to the ontological argument as an a priori proof for God’s existence. [5 marks]
  2. June 2023, Paper 2, Q02 (5 marks): Outline Norman Malcolm’s ontological argument. [5 marks]
  3. June 2022, Paper 2, Q01 (3 marks): State the definitions of ‘God’ used by (a) Anselm and (b) Descartes in their ontological arguments. [3 marks]
  4. November 2021, Paper 2, Q05 (25 marks): Can God’s existence be proved using an ontological argument? [25 marks]
  5. November 2020, Paper 2, Q03 (5 marks): Explain how inductive and deductive arguments for the existence of God differ. [5 marks]
  6. November 2020, Paper 2, Q04 (12 marks): Outline St Anselm’s ontological argument and explain Gaunilo’s ‘perfect island’ objection. [12 marks]

Questions, mark schemes and examiner’s reports are © AQA, from their published past papers. Plumi isn’t affiliated with any exam board. Want whole papers? Full past papers.

Rather write your answers by hand on iPad? Plumi marks them against the same mark schemes.